Showing posts with label apostrophe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apostrophe. Show all posts
Friday, 13 July 2012
Sunday, 3 June 2012
St James'ses
James Wood's use of the possessive in 'David Shields's recent manifesto "Reality Hunger"' (here, final para) is just plain ugly. But 'Roland Barthes's prosecutorial ruthlessness' (three lines later) is a real mind-warper.
Either it counts as doubly hideous - implying, as it may, that we think 'Barthes' is actually pronounced 'Barths' or 'Bart(h)ez' - and/or a mutant result of obsessive adherence to 'house style'; or it demonstrates an assumption that every New Yorker-reader knows full well that you don't pronounce the 'es' on the end of 'Barthes'.
Anyone fancy odds?*
--
*French-speakers do not apply.
Either it counts as doubly hideous - implying, as it may, that we think 'Barthes' is actually pronounced 'Barths' or 'Bart(h)ez' - and/or a mutant result of obsessive adherence to 'house style'; or it demonstrates an assumption that every New Yorker-reader knows full well that you don't pronounce the 'es' on the end of 'Barthes'.
Anyone fancy odds?*
--
*French-speakers do not apply.
Labels:
apostrophe,
David Shields,
New Yorker,
Roland Barthes,
St James'ses
Thursday, 4 August 2011
The Facebook comment I SO wanted to Like
Surely "Pak 'n Save" should be "Pa'k 'n' Save"? Or do they do that so they can pass the savings from the two dropped apostrophes onto we canny consumers?[With thanks to AH, who didn't give his permission for this in any way.]
Saturday, 2 April 2011
Geek moment
The great thing about the phrase 'at arm's length' is that it doesn't logically matter where you put the apostrophe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

