Publishers now pitch their books like Hollywood concepts, so Teju Cole’s first novel, “Open City” (Random House; $25), is being offered as especially appealing to “readers of Joseph O’Neill and Zadie Smith,” and written in a prose that “will remind you” of W. G. Sebald and J. M. Coetzee. This is shorthand for “post-colonialism in New York” (O’Neill), “lively multiracial themes” (Smith), “free-flowing form with no plot, narrated by a scholarly solitary walker” (Sebald), “obviously serious” (Coetzee), and “finely written” (all of the above). There is the additional comedy that Cole’s publishers, determined to retain the baby with the bathwater, boldly conjoin Smith and O’Neill, despite Smith’s hostility, advertised in an essay entitled “Two Paths for the Novel,” to O’Neill’s expensive and upholstered “lyrical realism.”- James Wood, The New Yorker
Showing posts with label Zadie Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zadie Smith. Show all posts
Monday, 21 October 2013
On Teju Cole
Labels:
books,
Coetzee,
Hollywood,
James Wood,
Joseph O'Neill,
New Yorker,
publishing,
Quoted Matter,
Sebald,
Teju Cole,
Zadie Smith
Thursday, 1 March 2012
Why hyphens are important
as proven, here, admittedly, by omission:
Though how they think they're going to bring back David Foster Wallace...
Two star novelists, Nathan Englander and Zadie Smith, on bringing back wrong and right, micro and macro writing, and David Foster Wallace- Guernica
Though how they think they're going to bring back David Foster Wallace...
Monday, 4 October 2010
Me, me, me - not you
Generally we refuse to be each other.- Zadie Smith, Changing My Mind: occasional essays
And quite right too.
Friday, 1 October 2010
The perils of self-awareness
What have we become when we 'understand' ourselves so well that all our questions are rhetorical?- Zadie Smith, Changing My Mind: occasional essays
What indeed.
[NB It is not clear to me whether the above is a rhetorical question. (Or the one above that.)]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
